Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 70081 for hi.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 70081 for hi.
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing as untimely his petition for writ of certiorari. The petition challenged a decision sustaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58067 - 2006-03-26
dismissing as untimely his petition for writ of certiorari. The petition challenged a decision sustaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58067 - 2006-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the same child. He also appeals an order denying his No. 2022AP1091-CR 2 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26
of the same child. He also appeals an order denying his No. 2022AP1091-CR 2 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals, pro se, from the circuit court’s orders denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98380 - 2013-06-24
appeals, pro se, from the circuit court’s orders denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98380 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
State v. Anthony R. West
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8293 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8293 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory standards, because he was not fully informed about his options. ¶2 I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364121 - 2021-05-06
statutory standards, because he was not fully informed about his options. ¶2 I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364121 - 2021-05-06
State v. David A. Bintz
was insufficient to support his conviction. Bintz’s arguments are unpersuasive, and we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to support his conviction. Bintz’s arguments are unpersuasive, and we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell L. Rose
from an order denying his motion to withdraw his pleas of no contest and guilty to these offenses. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his motion to withdraw his pleas of no contest and guilty to these offenses. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7579 - 2005-03-31
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7579 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 STARK, P.J.1 Yunus Turkmen appeals a judgment of conviction, entered upon his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245120 - 2019-08-13
. ¶1 STARK, P.J.1 Yunus Turkmen appeals a judgment of conviction, entered upon his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245120 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Russell L. Rose
of escape. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion to withdraw his pleas of no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4974 - 2017-09-19
of escape. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion to withdraw his pleas of no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4974 - 2017-09-19