Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 19831 for inmates search.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 19831 for inmates search.
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Reed
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15862 - 2017-09-21
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15862 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jimmy Reed
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15862 - 2005-03-31
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2009AP2536-CR 2 a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53192 - 2014-09-15
Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2009AP2536-CR 2 a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53192 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a police officer found when the officer searched him.1 We agree and reverse. I. ¶2 It was evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34701 - 2014-09-15
a police officer found when the officer searched him.1 We agree and reverse. I. ¶2 It was evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34701 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a police officer found when the officer searched him.[1] We agree and reverse. I. ¶2 It was evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24
a police officer found when the officer searched him.[1] We agree and reverse. I. ¶2 It was evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Morgan
(1991-92). Morgan challenged the legality of the pat-down search that produced the evidence leading
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16869 - 2017-09-21
(1991-92). Morgan challenged the legality of the pat-down search that produced the evidence leading
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16869 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael T. Morgan
-92). Morgan challenged the legality of the pat-down search that produced the evidence leading
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16869 - 2005-03-31
-92). Morgan challenged the legality of the pat-down search that produced the evidence leading
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
him of burglary. He argues that tools discovered by police while searching his car and later seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8533 - 2017-09-19
him of burglary. He argues that tools discovered by police while searching his car and later seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8533 - 2017-09-19