Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39101 - 39110 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 39101 - 39110 of 63531 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Linda Lacey
in a written order. However, Lacey has not made the postconviction motion hearing a part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6991 - 2017-09-20
in a written order. However, Lacey has not made the postconviction motion hearing a part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6991 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
on each count, ....” The record reflects that the $79.99 was attributed to restitution for the separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110449 - 2014-04-16
on each count, ....” The record reflects that the $79.99 was attributed to restitution for the separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110449 - 2014-04-16
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
authorized under s. 804.12 (2) (a).”[2] The record demonstrates here that Vulcan did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
authorized under s. 804.12 (2) (a).”[2] The record demonstrates here that Vulcan did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
State v. Teressa S.
for the party, or they can be subject to depositions.” (Record reference omitted.) Based on this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2501 - 2005-03-31
for the party, or they can be subject to depositions.” (Record reference omitted.) Based on this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2501 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
. To determine if a person would reasonably believe he was under arrest, this court reviews the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15009 - 2005-03-31
. To determine if a person would reasonably believe he was under arrest, this court reviews the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15009 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
. To determine if a person would reasonably believe he was under arrest, this court reviews the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15008 - 2005-03-31
. To determine if a person would reasonably believe he was under arrest, this court reviews the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court disagreed with the County’s position and dismissed the citation. Based upon the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208352 - 2018-02-14
. The circuit court disagreed with the County’s position and dismissed the citation. Based upon the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208352 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Johnson
was unlawful because the record does not establish a sufficient specific and articulable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20601 - 2017-09-21
was unlawful because the record does not establish a sufficient specific and articulable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott G. Zuniga
agreement. As the record makes perfectly clear, the trial court was very careful to warn Zuniga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4503 - 2017-09-19
agreement. As the record makes perfectly clear, the trial court was very careful to warn Zuniga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4503 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to disturb this finding given the evidence in the trial record that supported it. Id., ¶¶12-15, 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746641 - 2024-01-03
to disturb this finding given the evidence in the trial record that supported it. Id., ¶¶12-15, 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746641 - 2024-01-03