Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39111 - 39120 of 61886 for does.

City of Chilton v. Michael D. Dessart
court held that failure to comply with the implied consent provisions does not render the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6772 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elijah Brooks
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). An attorney’s failure to pursue a meritless motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17873 - 2005-05-02

CA Blank Order
, there is no basis to challenge either circuit court order. Our independent review of the record does not disclose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132527 - 2015-01-06

State v. Robert Garel
because Garel does not show sufficient reason for basing it on grounds which he could have, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11821 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert M. Wheeler
was convicted of possession of marijuana but he does not challenge that conviction on appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3711 - 2005-03-31

00-10 Amendment of Wis. Stats. ss. 801.58(7) and 808.08 - Internal Operating Procedures of Supreme Court and Court of Appeals - Right of Substitution of Judge on Remand
Bar of Wisconsin objected to the proposed rule because it does not give counsel an opportunity
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=984 - 2005-03-31

State v. Libbie P.
the child was living outside of her home and in foster care. It does not make any sense that Libbie should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11379 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious issue for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516119 - 2022-05-04

[PDF] State v. Robert M. Wheeler
but he does not challenge that conviction on appeal. No. 01-0682-CR 3 First, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3711 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert F. Cervenka v. Sawyer County
the Cervenkas feasible use of their property. The additional cost of such action does not change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13700 - 2014-09-15