Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39121 - 39130 of 69426 for as he.
Search results 39121 - 39130 of 69426 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2014AP1847-CR 2 Winchel argues that he should be resentenced. Winchel was convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156664 - 2017-09-21
2014AP1847-CR 2 Winchel argues that he should be resentenced. Winchel was convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156664 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jordan filed a complaint naming Steven Giuati and Angela Davis as defendants. He alleged a personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
. Jordan filed a complaint naming Steven Giuati and Angela Davis as defendants. He alleged a personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
CA Blank Order
the damages he alleged in his counterclaim. On appeal, Watters argues the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115636 - 2014-06-30
the damages he alleged in his counterclaim. On appeal, Watters argues the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115636 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument. Generally speaking, Ganta appears to complain that he did not receive a fair trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75596 - 2014-09-15
argument. Generally speaking, Ganta appears to complain that he did not receive a fair trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75596 - 2014-09-15
Iola Vision v. Paul Vermeern
provided his minor children by Iola Vision Center. He contends that his former wife, Dawn Melum, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31
provided his minor children by Iola Vision Center. He contends that his former wife, Dawn Melum, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Nelson
should have been reduced because: (1) he will not be provided a sex offender treatment program while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6680 - 2017-09-20
should have been reduced because: (1) he will not be provided a sex offender treatment program while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6680 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frederick Bowers v. David H. Schwarz
contends that the DOC imposed unlawful conditions on his future parole, he did not raise this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3094 - 2017-09-20
contends that the DOC imposed unlawful conditions on his future parole, he did not raise this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3094 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. David R. Bjerkaas
following revocation of his probation. He contends No(s). 99-2644-CR 2 that his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
following revocation of his probation. He contends No(s). 99-2644-CR 2 that his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Anthony Pratt v. Frank M. Cappozzo
an order dismissing the legal malpractice complaint he filed against Frank M. Cappozzo. Pratt claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9403 - 2017-09-19
an order dismissing the legal malpractice complaint he filed against Frank M. Cappozzo. Pratt claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9403 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel J. Frank
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Daniel J. Frank appeals from a judgment of conviction. He complained in his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Daniel J. Frank appeals from a judgment of conviction. He complained in his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31