Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39121 - 39130 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 39121 - 39130 of 64056 for records/1000.
[PDF]
WI App 150
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103832 - 2017-09-21
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103832 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Langlade County v. Janet S.
relevant circumstances of the case.” Id. ¶16 There is nothing in the record to indicate that Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4249 - 2017-09-19
relevant circumstances of the case.” Id. ¶16 There is nothing in the record to indicate that Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Langlade County v. Janet S.
relevant circumstances of the case.” Id. ¶16 There is nothing in the record to indicate that Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4251 - 2017-09-19
relevant circumstances of the case.” Id. ¶16 There is nothing in the record to indicate that Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4251 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Trent N.
of the IDEA. However, it is not clear from the appellate record or the parties’ briefs whether the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11267 - 2017-09-19
of the IDEA. However, it is not clear from the appellate record or the parties’ briefs whether the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11267 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. First, the record reveals Christine’s objectionable testimony amounted to only a small portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103098 - 2013-10-14
. First, the record reveals Christine’s objectionable testimony amounted to only a small portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103098 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
by imposing an excessive sentence without explaining its rationale. Based on our review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54642 - 2010-09-21
by imposing an excessive sentence without explaining its rationale. Based on our review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54642 - 2010-09-21
State v. Victor Naydihor
agreement before learning the extent of Naydihor’s prior record. Naydihor’s counsel argued for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
agreement before learning the extent of Naydihor’s prior record. Naydihor’s counsel argued for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) 22.17(2). 1 After considering the referee's report and the record in this matter, we agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180479 - 2017-09-21
) 22.17(2). 1 After considering the referee's report and the record in this matter, we agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 118
3 Wesley’s trial counsel entered the terms of the plea agreement on the record at the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36880 - 2014-09-15
3 Wesley’s trial counsel entered the terms of the plea agreement on the record at the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36880 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. THE COURT: Okay … I’ll make the same offer to you again. If you feel this record is so messed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58772 - 2014-09-15
. THE COURT: Okay … I’ll make the same offer to you again. If you feel this record is so messed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58772 - 2014-09-15