Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39121 - 39130 of 58547 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Kuehl
was impermissible under State v. Haseltine, 120 Wis.2d 92, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984). The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8454 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
Henry and brother Eric lived. The police recording was played at trial. The first phone message
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56806 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. George B. Gleason
for the jury to find that Gleason made a “true threat”; (2) whether we should grant Gleason a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5236 - 2017-09-19

Kevin Giffin v. Gary Poetzl
. § 802.08. Its purpose is to determine whether a dispute can be resolved without a trial. Preloznik v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
shouldn’t have had the gun.” Notably, Fish did not object to his trial counsel’s statement, and during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23

[PDF] County of Clark v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to the trial court. The trial court reversed. Edwards now appeals. DISCUSSION On appeal, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13631 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the evidence to support the charges, whether the terms of probation imposed were excessive, and trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543049 - 2022-07-13

COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing, claiming that the State breached the plea agreement at sentencing and that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14

[PDF] State v. Mark Steven Tracy
, the trial court did not expressly resolve it. In any event, Tracy did not challenge the officers’ entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6898 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Betty Novak v. Plum Creek Timberlands
-0629 2 ¶2 The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6243 - 2017-09-19