Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39141 - 39150 of 68502 for did.
Search results 39141 - 39150 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the performance-based reasons given by the department were “unfounded or grossly exaggerated” and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449324 - 2021-11-04
that the performance-based reasons given by the department were “unfounded or grossly exaggerated” and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449324 - 2021-11-04
[PDF]
WI APP 30
being served as a condition of probation. Id. at 386. We did so while acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27900 - 2014-09-15
being served as a condition of probation. Id. at 386. We did so while acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Ordinance did not afford constitutionally sufficient notice regarding what type of lighting was prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21
the Ordinance did not afford constitutionally sufficient notice regarding what type of lighting was prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not resolve the appeal. The hearing on Watkins’ appeal was then delayed while the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
did not resolve the appeal. The hearing on Watkins’ appeal was then delayed while the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
WI APP 191
that Nytsch’s request for judicial review did not raise the issue of probable cause but only highlighted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26065 - 2014-09-15
that Nytsch’s request for judicial review did not raise the issue of probable cause but only highlighted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Richardson
: Because the trial court incorrectly decided that the testimony was not relevant, however, the parties did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16990 - 2017-09-21
: Because the trial court incorrectly decided that the testimony was not relevant, however, the parties did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Raymond G. Sugden v. Cory R. Bock
), and concluded that it did. 2001 WI App 272 at ¶¶10-11. That provision provided: “The total limit of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3956 - 2017-09-20
), and concluded that it did. 2001 WI App 272 at ¶¶10-11. That provision provided: “The total limit of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3956 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that, but that the Department would “prefer” a finding based on WIS. STAT. § 48.13(10). The parents’ attorney did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30745 - 2014-09-15
that, but that the Department would “prefer” a finding based on WIS. STAT. § 48.13(10). The parents’ attorney did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30745 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Raymond D. Wilson
and attempted to kick Wilson. He threatened to beat her if she did not “knock it off.” The mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11764 - 2017-09-20
and attempted to kick Wilson. He threatened to beat her if she did not “knock it off.” The mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11764 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but neither did. Appellate counsel also notes that during sentencing, the State referenced a phone call
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289341 - 2020-09-22
, but neither did. Appellate counsel also notes that during sentencing, the State referenced a phone call
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289341 - 2020-09-22