Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39161 - 39170 of 67812 for law.

State v. Graham Greene
that restitution in this case was not authorized under § 973.20, Stats., 1993-94 and current case law,[6] argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12034 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, as that is a question of law. Id. ¶11 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919511 - 2025-02-26

Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee v. Uptown Arts and Education, Inc.
is unconstitutional on its face, due to vagueness, overbreadth or as applied, is a question of law which we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14401 - 2005-03-31

Dorothy E. Paulman Executor: Carole D. Paulman v. Jeannine Pemberton
of Thomas Van Beckum of Thomas Van Beckum Law Office, S.C., Kenosha. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14668 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 668, 689 (1984). Reasonable strategic choices informed by counsel’s investigation of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258179 - 2020-04-21

William J. Marth v. Robert Jahn
to be addressed in the Court’s declarations. It has to do with what rights, if any, under tort common law, judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a claim has arguable merit is a question of law reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Hansen v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760888 - 2024-02-08

[PDF] State v. William F. Jorgensen
assistance of counsel claim presents mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20

State v. Bruce A. Pickens
searches and seizures, a law enforcement officer must reasonably suspect, in light of his or her experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13307 - 2005-03-31

Robert Potratz v. Stokely Usa, Inc.
stack at the Plant is out of compliance with any applicable law or administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31