Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39181 - 39190 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 39181 - 39190 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Curtis E. Gallion
impact statements are authorized by Wis. Stat. § 972.14(3)(a). The logical corollary to these rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3471 - 2005-03-31
impact statements are authorized by Wis. Stat. § 972.14(3)(a). The logical corollary to these rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3471 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Maloney
. These recordings contained inculpatory statements by Maloney regarding the death of Sandra. ¶7 Based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21373 - 2017-09-21
. These recordings contained inculpatory statements by Maloney regarding the death of Sandra. ¶7 Based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Avery
not see a gun in Davis’s hand. Roby claimed that his trial testimony was true, including his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25530 - 2017-09-21
not see a gun in Davis’s hand. Roby claimed that his trial testimony was true, including his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25530 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Leslie R. Maddox v. Barricade Flasher Service, Inc.
., costs will be awarded as follows, subject to the timely filing of a statement of costs. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11372 - 2017-09-19
., costs will be awarded as follows, subject to the timely filing of a statement of costs. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11372 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Leslie R. Maddox v. Barricade Flasher Service, Inc.
., costs will be awarded as follows, subject to the timely filing of a statement of costs. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10971 - 2017-09-19
., costs will be awarded as follows, subject to the timely filing of a statement of costs. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10971 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 16
Although Van Asten effectively recanted this statement on cross-examination, the circuit court found Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91943 - 2014-09-15
Although Van Asten effectively recanted this statement on cross-examination, the circuit court found Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Lalor
. Similarly, while Lalor’s statements and his conduct in exposing himself were damaging to his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15368 - 2017-09-21
. Similarly, while Lalor’s statements and his conduct in exposing himself were damaging to his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by controlling United States Supreme Court” precedents. In support, Nelson points to the following statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28
by controlling United States Supreme Court” precedents. In support, Nelson points to the following statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
statement pertinent to the prejudice consideration that we can glean from Franklin’s briefing is that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32738 - 2008-05-19
statement pertinent to the prejudice consideration that we can glean from Franklin’s briefing is that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32738 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the prior inconsistent statement but determined that it was not necessary for the defense and could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
with the prior inconsistent statement but determined that it was not necessary for the defense and could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15