Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39181 - 39190 of 73031 for petition.
Search results 39181 - 39190 of 73031 for petition.
State v. Jeffery Rittenhouse
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2573 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2573 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald M. Petersilka
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15700 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15700 - 2005-03-31
City of Appleton v. Jennifer L. Drephal
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95750 - 2013-04-23
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95750 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
Lunda Construction Company v. Alliance Steel Construction
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7792 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7792 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26929 - 2014-09-15
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26929 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank Ithier
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12401 - 2017-09-21
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28422 - 2014-09-15
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28422 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999010 - 2025-08-19
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999010 - 2025-08-19
DaimlerChrysler v. LIRC
minimums for repeat surgical procedures for the knee. Upon DaimlerChrysler’s petition for review, LIRC
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21365 - 2006-02-14
minimums for repeat surgical procedures for the knee. Upon DaimlerChrysler’s petition for review, LIRC
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21365 - 2006-02-14