Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39191 - 39200 of 83808 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 39191 - 39200 of 83808 for simple case search/1000.
Certification
to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69689 - 2011-08-16
to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69689 - 2011-08-16
AM Transportation, Inc. v. Matarah Industries, Inc.
] of course have to get paid for their services. In this particular case, this was a shipping contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2436 - 2005-03-31
] of course have to get paid for their services. In this particular case, this was a shipping contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not a subject of this appeal. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149118 - 2017-09-21
is not a subject of this appeal. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149118 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
in November 2012 (Ozaukee County circuit court case No. 2012GN76). DHS wanted a new guardianship ready
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99393 - 2013-07-16
in November 2012 (Ozaukee County circuit court case No. 2012GN76). DHS wanted a new guardianship ready
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99393 - 2013-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Frederick N.
pretrial hearing, and warned the parties, including Mr. N., that they “must appear at every court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
pretrial hearing, and warned the parties, including Mr. N., that they “must appear at every court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
. The family contends that because of the “equities” of the case the alleged other acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
. The family contends that because of the “equities” of the case the alleged other acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard G. Bedessem v. Donna J. Bedessem
. At issue in this case is the trial court’s division of 139 shares of Farmers State Bank stock. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11360 - 2017-09-19
. At issue in this case is the trial court’s division of 139 shares of Farmers State Bank stock. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11360 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ellen Marie Fischer v. Michael Peter Fischer
as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.” The court gave a thorough and well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15177 - 2017-09-21
as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.” The court gave a thorough and well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
2006 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP935
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP935
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jason M. Byford v. Michael Edwards
the summons and complaint. Edwards appeared pro se at the April 29, 1999 scheduling conference in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2787 - 2017-09-19
the summons and complaint. Edwards appeared pro se at the April 29, 1999 scheduling conference in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2787 - 2017-09-19