Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39191 - 39200 of 58492 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order. ¶2 William is currently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49113 - 2010-04-19

Roberto M. Hinojosa v. John Husz
from the trial court’s order affirming his parole deferral. We, in turn, affirm the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15170 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
was convicted following a jury trial of armed robbery, theft of moveable property, and possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993357 - 2025-08-13

[PDF] William J. Evers v. Molly Sullivan-Olson
sanctions program. We conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the petition, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8329 - 2017-09-19

Debra L. Zenoni v. Jeffrey A. Zenoni
that some of the discovery on the exposure claim in this case was improper. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7112 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court inappropriately used the sentencing guidelines for the completed crime of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50501 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of material fact requiring a trial. See Wis. Stat. § 802.08(3). Here, Denis failed to provide specific facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110490 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] The Third Branch - spring 2012
to the Code of Judicial Conduct to acknowledge the active role of the trial court judge in problem-solving
/news/thirdbranch/docs/spring12.pdf - 2012-07-11

[MS WORD] FA-4160VA: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment - with Minor Children
trial and are on file. Se concluye que los bienes de las partes, sus intereses y valores, y sus
/formdisplay/FA-4160VA_es.doc?formNumber=FA-4160VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2022-12-14

State v. Karl Meyer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31