Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3921 - 3930 of 30021 for de.
Search results 3921 - 3930 of 30021 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 26
) to undisputed facts. We interpret and apply statutes de novo. See Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35219 - 2014-09-15
) to undisputed facts. We interpret and apply statutes de novo. See Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35219 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the municipal court’s decision denying the motion to reopen de novo. Village of Williams Bay v. Metzl, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068769 - 2026-01-27
the municipal court’s decision denying the motion to reopen de novo. Village of Williams Bay v. Metzl, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068769 - 2026-01-27
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Adams protested the de novo nature of the new proceeding, asserting he had prepared for a continuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132761 - 2017-09-21
. Adams protested the de novo nature of the new proceeding, asserting he had prepared for a continuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132761 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Henry P. Cops v. City of Kaukauna
from judgments of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4501 - 2017-09-19
from judgments of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4501 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Trinko
is a question of law that we review de novo. Socha v. Socha, 183 Wis. 2d 390, 393, 515 N.W.2d 337 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24600 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. Socha v. Socha, 183 Wis. 2d 390, 393, 515 N.W.2d 337 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24600 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stanley A. Otis
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Szulczewski
of undisputed facts are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31
of undisputed facts are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31
Connie Schult v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8072 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8072 - 2005-03-31