Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3921 - 3930 of 83854 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 3921 - 3930 of 83854 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
(July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. [3] All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
(July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. [3] All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ DOC 328.22 (July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. No. 2014AP753-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132848 - 2017-09-21
§ DOC 328.22 (July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. No. 2014AP753-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132848 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 8
warrantless searches leading to the issuance of the search warrant in this case, namely: (1) Belsha's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46694 - 2014-09-15
warrantless searches leading to the issuance of the search warrant in this case, namely: (1) Belsha's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46694 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
, but the Fourth Amendment precluded their immediate search of the case without a warrant. 442 U.S. at 761, 766
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46694 - 2010-02-08
, but the Fourth Amendment precluded their immediate search of the case without a warrant. 442 U.S. at 761, 766
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46694 - 2010-02-08
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Certification
in the application of the search warrant statutes and related case law, including Sveum. No. 2017AP208
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204845 - 2017-12-13
in the application of the search warrant statutes and related case law, including Sveum. No. 2017AP208
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204845 - 2017-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
The third factor, whether the search took place in an automobile, does not apply in this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132150 - 2014-12-22
The third factor, whether the search took place in an automobile, does not apply in this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132150 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the officers in this case was considerable. Officer Ruha conducted a warrantless search of Matalonis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21
by the officers in this case was considerable. Officer Ruha conducted a warrantless search of Matalonis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 76
. The State’s case rested in large part on the evidence recovered in the searches of Melssen’s smartphone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040263 - 2026-03-16
. The State’s case rested in large part on the evidence recovered in the searches of Melssen’s smartphone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040263 - 2026-03-16