Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39201 - 39210 of 61737 for does.
Search results 39201 - 39210 of 61737 for does.
COURT OF APPEALS
argument on appeal is that he did not refuse to submit to the requested test. Opelt does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106102 - 2013-12-26
argument on appeal is that he did not refuse to submit to the requested test. Opelt does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106102 - 2013-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
629 (1972). However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the [defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
629 (1972). However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the [defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
to withdraw the plea and enter another plea. This subsection does not limit the ability to withdraw a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36148 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw the plea and enter another plea. This subsection does not limit the ability to withdraw a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the cited material supports their assertions. This court does not “serve as both advocate and judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01
the cited material supports their assertions. This court does not “serve as both advocate and judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inference that could be drawn from the facts stated does not make the affidavit insufficient.” See Mann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003826 - 2025-09-03
inference that could be drawn from the facts stated does not make the affidavit insufficient.” See Mann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003826 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State does not raise that issue on appeal. Thus, we assume for purposes of this appeal that Hinderman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134923 - 2017-09-21
, the State does not raise that issue on appeal. Thus, we assume for purposes of this appeal that Hinderman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134923 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kelly G. O'Shea
predecessor if this does not require a weighing of testimony given before the predecessor and so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11707 - 2005-03-31
predecessor if this does not require a weighing of testimony given before the predecessor and so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11707 - 2005-03-31
Richard Bouchette v. Catherine Spatola
front porch,” he subsequently clarified that statement in the following colloquy: Q Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4709 - 2005-03-31
front porch,” he subsequently clarified that statement in the following colloquy: Q Does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4709 - 2005-03-31
Firstar Trust Company v. Richard D. Gebhardt
. Gebhardt and Sommer argue that because the loan does not reference the guarantee and because the guarantee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
. Gebhardt and Sommer argue that because the loan does not reference the guarantee and because the guarantee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricardo A. Montemayor, Jr.
conclude that trial counsel’s failure to request any identification instruction does not undermine our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5878 - 2005-03-31
conclude that trial counsel’s failure to request any identification instruction does not undermine our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5878 - 2005-03-31