Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39201 - 39210 of 82994 for simple case search.
Search results 39201 - 39210 of 82994 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
State v. Daniel Anderson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a decision in this appeal will have any practical effect in this case, this court dismisses her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
that a decision in this appeal will have any practical effect in this case, this court dismisses her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
with use of force arising in Milwaukee County case No. 2005CF1059, and the other for escape arising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70794 - 2011-09-12
with use of force arising in Milwaukee County case No. 2005CF1059, and the other for escape arising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70794 - 2011-09-12
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
against Sam’s Club. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
against Sam’s Club. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
Professional Guardianships, Inc. v. Ruth E. J.
Case No.: 95-2010 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9411 - 2017-09-19
Case No.: 95-2010 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9411 - 2017-09-19