Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39211 - 39220 of 68502 for did.
Search results 39211 - 39220 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
WI APP 30
being served as a condition of probation. Id. at 386. We did so while acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27900 - 2014-09-15
being served as a condition of probation. Id. at 386. We did so while acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Ordinance did not afford constitutionally sufficient notice regarding what type of lighting was prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21
the Ordinance did not afford constitutionally sufficient notice regarding what type of lighting was prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not resolve the appeal. The hearing on Watkins’ appeal was then delayed while the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
did not resolve the appeal. The hearing on Watkins’ appeal was then delayed while the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
WI APP 191
that Nytsch’s request for judicial review did not raise the issue of probable cause but only highlighted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26065 - 2014-09-15
that Nytsch’s request for judicial review did not raise the issue of probable cause but only highlighted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Richardson
: Because the trial court incorrectly decided that the testimony was not relevant, however, the parties did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16990 - 2017-09-21
: Because the trial court incorrectly decided that the testimony was not relevant, however, the parties did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16990 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
was at the building, he heard “talk” about setting a fire and saw a gas can. He claimed that he did not pour any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
was at the building, he heard “talk” about setting a fire and saw a gas can. He claimed that he did not pour any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with that claim. Magnon stated that despite Sarah’s age, he did not end the conversation because he was bored
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34575 - 2008-11-11
with that claim. Magnon stated that despite Sarah’s age, he did not end the conversation because he was bored
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34575 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, M.L. Baker exited the car. He was alone. S.T. did not know Baker, but testified that the day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248751 - 2019-10-23
, M.L. Baker exited the car. He was alone. S.T. did not know Baker, but testified that the day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248751 - 2019-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Trina J.
more status date for January 26, 1996.3 On Friday, January 26, 1996, when Trina J. did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10923 - 2017-09-20
more status date for January 26, 1996.3 On Friday, January 26, 1996, when Trina J. did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10923 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
digital sign did not comply with Section 26-83(a) of the Sign Ordinance and the digital sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207903 - 2018-02-01
digital sign did not comply with Section 26-83(a) of the Sign Ordinance and the digital sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207903 - 2018-02-01