Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39221 - 39230 of 63904 for records.
Search results 39221 - 39230 of 63904 for records.
State v. Anne Carol Van Dommelen
(1999). We note at the outset of our analysis that the record reveals, and the parties do not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18821 - 2005-07-05
(1999). We note at the outset of our analysis that the record reveals, and the parties do not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18821 - 2005-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
equalization payment of $7921.84. By its inclusion in the record, we deem the circuit court to have adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79982 - 2012-03-27
equalization payment of $7921.84. By its inclusion in the record, we deem the circuit court to have adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79982 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and the record, No. 2023AP593 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
our review of the briefs and the record, No. 2023AP593 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968154 - 2025-06-10
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968154 - 2025-06-10
State v. Steven Schelk
Schelk’s profile prior to the stop. This finding is supported by evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
Schelk’s profile prior to the stop. This finding is supported by evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joan M. Boyd
contained certain facts that the OLR asserted were not facts of record. The referee agreed, whereupon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24677 - 2006-03-29
contained certain facts that the OLR asserted were not facts of record. The referee agreed, whereupon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24677 - 2006-03-29
Karen Herek v. State
with this argument is the state of the record. The plaintiffs assert that we can take judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3470 - 2005-03-31
with this argument is the state of the record. The plaintiffs assert that we can take judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, if the record conclusively shows that the appellant is not entitled to relief. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33786 - 2014-09-15
, if the record conclusively shows that the appellant is not entitled to relief. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33786 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
records by Herzfeldt’s dispatcher that Smith did not have a valid 2007 fishing license. ¶3 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33784 - 2014-09-15
records by Herzfeldt’s dispatcher that Smith did not have a valid 2007 fishing license. ¶3 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33784 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the record supports the circuit court’s conclusion that the State did not extend the alleged offer, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50001 - 2014-09-15
the record supports the circuit court’s conclusion that the State did not extend the alleged offer, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50001 - 2014-09-15