Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39221 - 39230 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 39221 - 39230 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Daniel J. Voigt
does not establish a substantial and material breach of the plea agreement; that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
does not establish a substantial and material breach of the plea agreement; that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
Richard J. Nichols v. Patrick J. Conlin
a just cause hearing. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9786 - 2005-03-31
a just cause hearing. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
resentencing. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting when the prosecutor, in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
resentencing. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting when the prosecutor, in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
01-18 Creation of rules providing guidance on assistance to individual court users (Effective 07-01-02)
to assert in pleadings or at trial. (h) Recommend what types or amount of damages to seek or the specific
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=957 - 2005-03-31
to assert in pleadings or at trial. (h) Recommend what types or amount of damages to seek or the specific
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=957 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruth Woodring
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Thompson, Jr.
discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21395 - 2017-09-21
discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A. Gayhart
and just reason, which must be something more than a desire to have a trial. See id. at 861-62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15573 - 2017-09-21
and just reason, which must be something more than a desire to have a trial. See id. at 861-62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15573 - 2017-09-21
Linda Hanson v. Jerry Christensen
and across Christensen’s property until it ends at Hanson’s property.[2] At trial, Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19375 - 2005-08-22
and across Christensen’s property until it ends at Hanson’s property.[2] At trial, Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19375 - 2005-08-22
State v. Paul H. Gates
to the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress evidence. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress evidence. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
Noffke Lumber, Inc. v. James P. Siepmann
project. After a trial to the court, the court found that Noffke acted in good faith in supplying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13381 - 2005-03-31
project. After a trial to the court, the court found that Noffke acted in good faith in supplying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13381 - 2005-03-31