Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39231 - 39240 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 39231 - 39240 of 83320 for case search.
Winnebago County Department of Health and Human Services v. Bruce H.
with directions. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6452 - 2005-03-31
with directions. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6452 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissing Gladney’s case with prejudice. The order provided that, for the reasons set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470379 - 2022-01-11
dismissing Gladney’s case with prejudice. The order provided that, for the reasons set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470379 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95377 - 2014-09-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95377 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not want to nor feel qualified to testify as an expert in this case, and had never spoken to the Blotzers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30831 - 2014-09-15
not want to nor feel qualified to testify as an expert in this case, and had never spoken to the Blotzers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30831 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11565 - 2017-09-19
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
In the present case, the circuit court relied upon Holtzman v. Knott, 193 Wis. 2d 649, 533 N.W.2d 419 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65044 - 2011-05-31
In the present case, the circuit court relied upon Holtzman v. Knott, 193 Wis. 2d 649, 533 N.W.2d 419 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65044 - 2011-05-31
CA Blank Order
on parole eligibility as a factor in determining sentence in this case, and therefore, the defendant’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126926 - 2014-11-05
on parole eligibility as a factor in determining sentence in this case, and therefore, the defendant’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126926 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24926 - 2017-09-21
the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24926 - 2017-09-21