Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39231 - 39240 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 39231 - 39240 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Janice D.
cases on the motion of Janice D.’s attorney. Nos. 03-2207 03-2208 3 outside the homes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6780 - 2017-09-20
cases on the motion of Janice D.’s attorney. Nos. 03-2207 03-2208 3 outside the homes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6780 - 2017-09-20
09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
a motion.” Woodford’s counsel made one last comment, “Your Honor, but the Court—the case law suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
a motion.” Woodford’s counsel made one last comment, “Your Honor, but the Court—the case law suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
their case adjourned so Mr. Simmons can go to trial. The case then proceeded to trial, and Simmons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
their case adjourned so Mr. Simmons can go to trial. The case then proceeded to trial, and Simmons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Perry E. Blanks
of the present case; (3) that the prior act is clearly relevant to a material issue; (4) that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8628 - 2017-09-19
of the present case; (3) that the prior act is clearly relevant to a material issue; (4) that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8628 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “Protection of the community is absolutely, positively 99 percent of everything in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21
, “Protection of the community is absolutely, positively 99 percent of everything in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
address the merits of the case, we note that State Farm has challenged the timeliness of the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07
address the merits of the case, we note that State Farm has challenged the timeliness of the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
trial dates of February 15, 2011 or August 23, 2011. Flehmer’s trial was delayed because other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87247 - 2012-09-17
trial dates of February 15, 2011 or August 23, 2011. Flehmer’s trial was delayed because other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87247 - 2012-09-17
[PDF]
Schams Joint Revocable Trust by David F. Schams v. William M. Evans
in a given case. Department of Revenue v. Mark, 168 Wis.2d 288, 293 n.3, 483 N.W.2d 302, 304 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14841 - 2017-09-21
in a given case. Department of Revenue v. Mark, 168 Wis.2d 288, 293 n.3, 483 N.W.2d 302, 304 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14841 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carlos Frum v. Lee I. Wigod
did not reveal that he had commenced a bankruptcy case. He paid the amounts due at closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10366 - 2017-09-20
did not reveal that he had commenced a bankruptcy case. He paid the amounts due at closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10366 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there was no written agreement regarding repayment to Ronald; (2) that unjust enrichment was not pled in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208363 - 2018-02-13
there was no written agreement regarding repayment to Ronald; (2) that unjust enrichment was not pled in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208363 - 2018-02-13