Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39241 - 39250 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 39241 - 39250 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Jane E. Chen v. John J. Warner
not defer to the trial court’s determination of a question of law; however, because the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6123 - 2005-03-31
not defer to the trial court’s determination of a question of law; however, because the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jane E. Chen v. John J. Warner
presents a question of law. Ordinarily, an appellate court need not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6123 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law. Ordinarily, an appellate court need not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6123 - 2017-09-19
State v. Germaine M. Taylor
merely because, had they been in the trial judge's position, they would have meted out a different
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21700 - 2006-03-07
merely because, had they been in the trial judge's position, they would have meted out a different
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21700 - 2006-03-07
WI App 19 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP127-CR Complete Title ...
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his inculpatory statement “made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106680 - 2014-03-04
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his inculpatory statement “made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106680 - 2014-03-04
[PDF]
WI App 19
). 1 Moore argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106680 - 2017-09-21
). 1 Moore argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106680 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vanessa D. Hughes
was not supported by probable cause or justified by exigent circumstances. ¶13 The trial court determined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17249 - 2005-03-31
was not supported by probable cause or justified by exigent circumstances. ¶13 The trial court determined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17249 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D. Gundlach
the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress all testimony and evidence obtained following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9179 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress all testimony and evidence obtained following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the court decided the evidence was sufficient for jury trial.[5] The court granted Krist summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29869 - 2007-07-30
the court decided the evidence was sufficient for jury trial.[5] The court granted Krist summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29869 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The operative statute there called for de novo review by the trial court. Soo Line commenced an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15
. The operative statute there called for de novo review by the trial court. Soo Line commenced an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
him, after a jury trial, of disorderly conduct and unlawful use of a computerized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115994 - 2017-09-21
him, after a jury trial, of disorderly conduct and unlawful use of a computerized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115994 - 2017-09-21