Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39251 - 39260 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39251 - 39260 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Raymond Bier v. Mike Wicks
and remand for a trial. We also deny Wicks's and Bier's motions for fees and costs under § 809.25(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10299 - 2005-03-31
and remand for a trial. We also deny Wicks's and Bier's motions for fees and costs under § 809.25(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
proceeds to LaVonne’s estate, the County filed a motion for contempt. A contempt hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
proceeds to LaVonne’s estate, the County filed a motion for contempt. A contempt hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his motion to admit other crimes, wrong or acts evidence. We reject this argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
by denying his motion to admit other crimes, wrong or acts evidence. We reject this argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 STAT. § 941.29(2)(a) (2009-10),1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15
2 STAT. § 941.29(2)(a) (2009-10),1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the circuit court improperly denied his motion to suppress the evidence obtained when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55300 - 2010-10-12
argues that the circuit court improperly denied his motion to suppress the evidence obtained when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55300 - 2010-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
in her system. ¶4 Torbeck filed a motion to suppress on the grounds that Putzer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
in her system. ¶4 Torbeck filed a motion to suppress on the grounds that Putzer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
Janesville & Southeastern Railway Company v. Gardner Realty Corporation
and consider costs on a motion. ¶2 Gardner Realty first argues that the complaint filed by Janesville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6133 - 2017-09-19
and consider costs on a motion. ¶2 Gardner Realty first argues that the complaint filed by Janesville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, both by use of a dangerous weapon. She also appeals an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105043 - 2017-09-21
, both by use of a dangerous weapon. She also appeals an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress the result of a preliminary breath test that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91012 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress the result of a preliminary breath test that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91012 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29
, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29