Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39251 - 39260 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 39251 - 39260 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36014 - 2009-03-30
] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36014 - 2009-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
court went on to conclude that Potvine was not prejudiced because there was “nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126125 - 2014-11-05
court went on to conclude that Potvine was not prejudiced because there was “nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126125 - 2014-11-05
State v. Gregory L. Schroeder
). The record reveals that Schroeder’s trial had been rescheduled five times. Schroeder was charged on December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
). The record reveals that Schroeder’s trial had been rescheduled five times. Schroeder was charged on December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
interviewed Niesen three times in early 2009 and excerpts from these recorded interviews were introduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71782 - 2011-10-04
interviewed Niesen three times in early 2009 and excerpts from these recorded interviews were introduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71782 - 2011-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
“at the very least counsel should have ordered the records for review through the court. By doing so would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34572 - 2008-11-11
“at the very least counsel should have ordered the records for review through the court. By doing so would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34572 - 2008-11-11
State v. Cornelius Flowers
expressly found Flowers’ testimony to be incredible. ¶16 The record supports the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5709 - 2005-03-31
expressly found Flowers’ testimony to be incredible. ¶16 The record supports the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wisconsin’s implied consent law, and that there was no “suggestion” in the record that, when Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245227 - 2019-08-15
of Wisconsin’s implied consent law, and that there was no “suggestion” in the record that, when Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245227 - 2019-08-15
[PDF]
Local 617 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
the same record. Barnes v. DNR, 178 Wis. 2d 290, 307, 506 N.W.2d 155 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4098 - 2017-09-20
the same record. Barnes v. DNR, 178 Wis. 2d 290, 307, 506 N.W.2d 155 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4098 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Tara P.
legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis. 2d 332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4588 - 2017-09-19
legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis. 2d 332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael Marks
, we may affirm a decision if we can determine for ourselves that the facts of record provide a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20
, we may affirm a decision if we can determine for ourselves that the facts of record provide a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20