Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39251 - 39260 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 39251 - 39260 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous based upon the record before the circuit court. Id. ¶12 Once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88840 - 2014-09-15
unless they are clearly erroneous based upon the record before the circuit court. Id. ¶12 Once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88840 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
that counsel was ineffective for failing to demand a speedy trial, we conclude that the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15484 - 2005-03-31
that counsel was ineffective for failing to demand a speedy trial, we conclude that the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by ordering joinder of his three cases. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27
by ordering joinder of his three cases. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36014 - 2009-03-30
] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36014 - 2009-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
court went on to conclude that Potvine was not prejudiced because there was “nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126125 - 2014-11-05
court went on to conclude that Potvine was not prejudiced because there was “nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126125 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP2116 7 Safeco’s misrepresentation of the record. Safeco informs us the “circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97054 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP2116 7 Safeco’s misrepresentation of the record. Safeco informs us the “circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97054 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory L. Schroeder
). The record reveals that Schroeder’s trial had been rescheduled five times. Schroeder was charged on December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
). The record reveals that Schroeder’s trial had been rescheduled five times. Schroeder was charged on December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
interviewed Niesen three times in early 2009 and excerpts from these recorded interviews were introduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71782 - 2011-10-04
interviewed Niesen three times in early 2009 and excerpts from these recorded interviews were introduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71782 - 2011-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
“at the very least counsel should have ordered the records for review through the court. By doing so would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34572 - 2008-11-11
“at the very least counsel should have ordered the records for review through the court. By doing so would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34572 - 2008-11-11
State v. Cornelius Flowers
expressly found Flowers’ testimony to be incredible. ¶16 The record supports the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5709 - 2005-03-31
expressly found Flowers’ testimony to be incredible. ¶16 The record supports the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5709 - 2005-03-31