Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39271 - 39280 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 39271 - 39280 of 83344 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Tigerwolf Angelo Prey-Perez
with a stick. The two cases were consolidated and Prey-Perez reached an agreement with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11728 - 2017-09-20
with a stick. The two cases were consolidated and Prey-Perez reached an agreement with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11728 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, but the Court—the case law suggests that it can’t be done routinely.” “File a motion,” was the court’s final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
, but the Court—the case law suggests that it can’t be done routinely.” “File a motion,” was the court’s final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the charges that were filed in this case. Heinrich filed a motion to suppress that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162218 - 2017-09-21
to support the charges that were filed in this case. Heinrich filed a motion to suppress that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162218 - 2017-09-21
WI App 162 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP64 Complete Title of ...
2011 WI App 162 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP64 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73798 - 2011-12-13
2011 WI App 162 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP64 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73798 - 2011-12-13
State v. Wallace J. Hammerle
the prosecutor. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963). In this case, the undisclosed exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6230 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963). In this case, the undisclosed exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6230 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
interrogated. The underlying relevant facts are as follows. The victim in the case alleged that La Dousier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28816 - 2007-05-01
interrogated. The underlying relevant facts are as follows. The victim in the case alleged that La Dousier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28816 - 2007-05-01
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
State v. Basil Richmond
to a material issue, that it is necessary to the defendant’s case, and that its probative value outweighs its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14113 - 2005-03-31
to a material issue, that it is necessary to the defendant’s case, and that its probative value outweighs its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14113 - 2005-03-31
Luann Gehin v. Wisconsin Group Insurance Board
Wisconsin case law explaining that “‘[m]ere uncorroborated hearsay or rumor does not constitute substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6093 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin case law explaining that “‘[m]ere uncorroborated hearsay or rumor does not constitute substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6093 - 2005-03-31