Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39271 - 39280 of 50524 for our.
Search results 39271 - 39280 of 50524 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. ¶15 Because our decision on the prejudice prong is dispositive, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19
. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. ¶15 Because our decision on the prejudice prong is dispositive, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, ¶46, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817 N.W.2d 848. Our independent review of the record discloses no other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05
, ¶46, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817 N.W.2d 848. Our independent review of the record discloses no other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by our agreement, does he? A: Correct. No. 2019AP1152-CR 5 Q: And you knew going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317120 - 2020-12-22
by our agreement, does he? A: Correct. No. 2019AP1152-CR 5 Q: And you knew going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317120 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Smith and Ruby R. Smith. Based upon our review of the briefs and appellate records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04
Smith and Ruby R. Smith. Based upon our review of the briefs and appellate records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statute is clear on its face, we apply it as written. Id. Our primary purpose in reviewing a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213566 - 2018-05-30
of the statute is clear on its face, we apply it as written. Id. Our primary purpose in reviewing a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213566 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Curtis P. Johnson
” for which he was convicted. ¶14 Because sentencing is a discretionary function of the court, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7409 - 2017-09-20
” for which he was convicted. ¶14 Because sentencing is a discretionary function of the court, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7409 - 2017-09-20
State v. William P. Eckola
with it a mandatory or presumptive minimum sentence. In State v. Duffy, 54 Wis. 2d 61, 65, 194 N.W.2d 624 (1972), our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3857 - 2005-03-31
with it a mandatory or presumptive minimum sentence. In State v. Duffy, 54 Wis. 2d 61, 65, 194 N.W.2d 624 (1972), our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3857 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony A. Parker
or, alternatively, is a new factor meriting sentence modification. By our count, this is Parker’s fourth attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
or, alternatively, is a new factor meriting sentence modification. By our count, this is Parker’s fourth attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Sawyer raises sixteen issues, most of which are addressed in our ruling on the propriety of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
Sawyer raises sixteen issues, most of which are addressed in our ruling on the propriety of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31