Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39271 - 39280 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 39271 - 39280 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Kelsey C.R.
. STAT. § 948.60(2)(a). She claims that the trial court erroneously denied her suppression motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16246 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 948.60(2)(a). She claims that the trial court erroneously denied her suppression motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16246 - 2017-09-21
State v. Orbbie Williams
of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate interference with the discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate interference with the discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for use of their motor vehicles.” WIS. STAT. § 346.61. At the jury trial, Mitchell’s defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251099 - 2019-12-11
for use of their motor vehicles.” WIS. STAT. § 346.61. At the jury trial, Mitchell’s defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251099 - 2019-12-11
State v. Karl Meyer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The matter proceeded to trial where the circuit court answered the two verdict questions for abandonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208293 - 2018-02-14
). The matter proceeded to trial where the circuit court answered the two verdict questions for abandonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208293 - 2018-02-14
State v. Michael Bremer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Voigt
does not establish a substantial and material breach of the plea agreement; that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
does not establish a substantial and material breach of the plea agreement; that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Smith
to be released on November 7, 2002. ¶3 The State called two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6661 - 2005-03-31
to be released on November 7, 2002. ¶3 The State called two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
resentencing. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting when the prosecutor, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
resentencing. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting when the prosecutor, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
CA Blank Order
behalf, counsel avers in an affidavit attached to the supplement to his no-merit report that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135472 - 2015-02-17
behalf, counsel avers in an affidavit attached to the supplement to his no-merit report that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135472 - 2015-02-17