Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39291 - 39300 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
of a pilot project for dedicated trial court judicial dockets for large claim business and commercial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254091 - 2020-02-12

[PDF] Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
" required terminating him. On certiorari review, the trial court affirmed the Commission. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8003 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
fact which we decide independently of the trial court’s determination. Id. at 249. The factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26679 - 2014-09-15

State v. Corrine L. Brazee
performed on the blood sample. The trial court denied the motion,[3] Brazee pled no contest to the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4086 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Phillip W. Spagnola
., which he contends is unconstitutional. The trial court disagreed and so do we. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8297 - 2017-09-19

Carla Randecker v. Frances C. Lindsey
the defendants’ insurers. The two actions were consolidated for trial. ¶2 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2194 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by the trial court. Because we conclude that the Department acted properly when it revoked his extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
to be offered at trial. Opposing counsel wrote to him one month after the date by which he was to have named
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the texts, but no outgoing texts remained at that time. ¶6 Fields did not testify at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68987 - 2011-08-01

Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
. The trial court’s duty to warn and inform the parent under § 48.356(2) is included in the “'panoply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12882 - 2005-03-31