Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39291 - 39300 of 58245 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Production Credit Association of Southeast Wisconsin v. Gorton Farms
reverse the trial court’s holding to the contrary. Gorton Farms is a partnership whose business is crop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11626 - 2017-09-19

Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
of the evidence supporting the jury’s verdict nor does she question the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13863 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy L. Kaelin
), STATS., all as a repeater contrary to § 939.62, STATS. A preliminary hearing was held and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8017 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel when his trial counsel No. 2011AP676-CR 2 failed to move to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83872 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 110. ¶4 After a bench trial, the circuit court issued a written decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246179 - 2019-09-04

State v. Thomas A. Mikulance
. § 974.06 and Wis. Stat. § 973.13. He argued that “[t]he State and trial court failed to inform [him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21764 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] James Ronald Gaddis v. La Crosse Products, Inc.
. No. 94-2121-FT 3 complaint on the grounds that the summons was defective. The trial court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16934 - 2017-09-21

Carole L. Arenz v. Leo J. Bronston
chiropractors are not “health care providers” under § 893.55. The trial court concluded that chiropractors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14008 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in the loss of their dog. Society did not appear at trial, and the circuit court entered a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Additionally, Johnson contends that a defamation trial would violate her First Amendment rights. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028555 - 2025-10-28