Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3931 - 3940 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3931 - 3940 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
order denying his sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28408 - 2007-03-12
order denying his sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28408 - 2007-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his custodial statements. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37012 - 2009-07-06
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his custodial statements. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37012 - 2009-07-06
State v. Bryant U.
having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17973 - 2005-05-02
having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17973 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28408 - 2014-09-15
sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28408 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bryant U.
having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17974 - 2005-05-02
having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17974 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
erred when it denied No. 2008AP2401-CR 2 his motion to suppress his custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37012 - 2014-09-15
erred when it denied No. 2008AP2401-CR 2 his motion to suppress his custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Bryant U.
with the persons having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court changed the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17974 - 2017-09-21
with the persons having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court changed the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17974 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bryant U.
with the persons having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court changed the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17973 - 2017-09-21
with the persons having physical custody of them. ¶4 On the State’s motion, the trial court changed the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17973 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Don Summers, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111030 - 2014-04-28
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Don Summers, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111030 - 2014-04-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The circuit court denied the motion. Because Daniels was no longer “a prisoner in custody” and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54973 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court denied the motion. Because Daniels was no longer “a prisoner in custody” and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54973 - 2014-09-15