Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39301 - 39310 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39301 - 39310 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94401 - 2013-03-25
. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94401 - 2013-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for summary judgment because it failed to properly serve him with the summons and complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259168 - 2020-05-06
motion for summary judgment because it failed to properly serve him with the summons and complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259168 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence that he had been operating the vehicle. The circuit court denied the motion, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91502 - 2014-09-15
evidence that he had been operating the vehicle. The circuit court denied the motion, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91502 - 2014-09-15
City of Middleton v. Theresa J. Hennen
§ 800.14(5), Stats., which provides as follows: If there is no request or motion under sub. (4),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9919 - 2005-03-31
§ 800.14(5), Stats., which provides as follows: If there is no request or motion under sub. (4),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9919 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
referencing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996).[2] In June 2006, the County filed a motion in limine asking the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33787 - 2008-08-18
referencing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996).[2] In June 2006, the County filed a motion in limine asking the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33787 - 2008-08-18
Raymond Bier v. Mike Wicks
and remand for a trial. We also deny Wicks's and Bier's motions for fees and costs under § 809.25(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10299 - 2005-03-31
and remand for a trial. We also deny Wicks's and Bier's motions for fees and costs under § 809.25(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 Brown filed a motion to suppress the evidence, arguing that it was obtained as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09
. ¶3 Brown filed a motion to suppress the evidence, arguing that it was obtained as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
proceeds to LaVonne’s estate, the County filed a motion for contempt. A contempt hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
proceeds to LaVonne’s estate, the County filed a motion for contempt. A contempt hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his motion to admit other crimes, wrong or acts evidence. We reject this argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
by denying his motion to admit other crimes, wrong or acts evidence. We reject this argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 STAT. § 941.29(2)(a) (2009-10),1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15
2 STAT. § 941.29(2)(a) (2009-10),1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69297 - 2014-09-15