Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39311 - 39320 of 69007 for had.
Search results 39311 - 39320 of 69007 for had.
CA Blank Order
that, although Jones now asserted that his girlfriend would pay the cost of new DNA testing, Jones had failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118590 - 2014-07-28
that, although Jones now asserted that his girlfriend would pay the cost of new DNA testing, Jones had failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118590 - 2014-07-28
State v. Dale H. Krause
and fees of $350, and surcharges of $50. The judgment of conviction acknowledged that Krause had paid full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15958 - 2005-03-31
and fees of $350, and surcharges of $50. The judgment of conviction acknowledged that Krause had paid full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald A. LeSavage
that LeSavage had been driving while under the influence of an intoxicant and arrested him. At the Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10063 - 2017-09-19
that LeSavage had been driving while under the influence of an intoxicant and arrested him. At the Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶76, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110218 - 2017-09-21
court’s decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶76, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110218 - 2017-09-21
Donald E. Stoetzel v. City of New Berlin
, Stoetzel was asked by his attorney how many times he had been convicted of a crime. Stoetzel answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8476 - 2005-03-31
, Stoetzel was asked by his attorney how many times he had been convicted of a crime. Stoetzel answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Amy Sue Halvorsen v. Ronald Martin Halvorsen
Ronald Halvorsen and Amy Sue Halvorsen were married in 1996. Both had been married previously, and Amy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4473 - 2017-09-19
Ronald Halvorsen and Amy Sue Halvorsen were married in 1996. Both had been married previously, and Amy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4473 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
”). No. 03-1627-CR 4 At the time Tucker’s sentence was imposed in the Milwaukee County case, he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6602 - 2017-09-19
”). No. 03-1627-CR 4 At the time Tucker’s sentence was imposed in the Milwaukee County case, he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6602 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 18
. to pay a civil forfeiture. However, the district attorney did not tell Attorney Ginsberg she had signed
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35598 - 2014-09-15
. to pay a civil forfeiture. However, the district attorney did not tell Attorney Ginsberg she had signed
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35598 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 678 N.W.2d 197. At the outset, the circuit court noted that Thompson’s probation had been revoked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172301 - 2017-09-21
, 678 N.W.2d 197. At the outset, the circuit court noted that Thompson’s probation had been revoked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
reconfinement sentence on the grounds that no one had advised the court about the ALJ’s recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47800 - 2014-09-15
reconfinement sentence on the grounds that no one had advised the court about the ALJ’s recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47800 - 2014-09-15