Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39341 - 39350 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 39341 - 39350 of 83284 for case search.
Kimberly Area School District v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
2005 WI App 262 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP666 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20262 - 2006-01-09
2005 WI App 262 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP666 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20262 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
credit for the time he spent on electronic monitoring while on bond in the case. Following a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164081 - 2017-09-21
credit for the time he spent on electronic monitoring while on bond in the case. Following a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164081 - 2017-09-21
Shirley Madrigrano v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.
474 (Wis. Jan. 18, 2000) (No. 98-2846). ¶7 The underlying issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2525 - 2005-03-31
474 (Wis. Jan. 18, 2000) (No. 98-2846). ¶7 The underlying issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995) (citing DePratt, 113 Wis. 2d at 311). In the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45687 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995) (citing DePratt, 113 Wis. 2d at 311). In the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45687 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95377 - 2014-09-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95377 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not want to nor feel qualified to testify as an expert in this case, and had never spoken to the Blotzers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30831 - 2014-09-15
not want to nor feel qualified to testify as an expert in this case, and had never spoken to the Blotzers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30831 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wallace J. Hammerle
from the prosecutor. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963). In this case, the undisclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6230 - 2017-09-19
from the prosecutor. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963). In this case, the undisclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11565 - 2017-09-19
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to affirm the circuit court in this case. No. 2008AP696 3 ¶4 The County relies primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
to affirm the circuit court in this case. No. 2008AP696 3 ¶4 The County relies primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15