Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39341 - 39350 of 68276 for did.

William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
The Keefes did not appeal the judgment. Instead, in November 2003, they moved for relief from judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19964 - 2005-10-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was in custody in Arizona as opposed to Wisconsin, and therefore Wisconsin courts did not have jurisdiction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362731 - 2021-05-04

[PDF] Jessica L. Edwardson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
that they did not “encourage, advise or assist the driver of the automobile to operate on the bicycle trail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14104 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
was entered in 1997 in the Arthurs’ favor dismissing the Keefes’ complaint. ¶8 The Keefes did not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Travis A. Curtis
-burglary charges were multiplicitous offenses; (6) the prosecution did not prove Curtis’s guilt beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12163 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Andre L. Avery
of the three crimes. Although he also appealed, Leonard did not challenge the dual jury procedure. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11530 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] George Burnett v. Dawn Alt
. No agreement was reached, and Burnett did not seek a protective order. Acosta's deposition proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11738 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
) is inapplicable. She contends the September 14, 2006 order was not final “as it did not dispose of all issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35958 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
bar,” Halfmann did not relay that information to the warrant-issuing judge. 4 The affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205763 - 2017-12-20

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
-shifting provision of the WCA. Because we conclude that the customers did prevail in the circuit court, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12359 - 2005-03-31