Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Luis Vasquez
and shot Erickson. No. 01-1119-CR 3 ¶3 The State’s case was based primarily on Berrisford’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
and shot Erickson. No. 01-1119-CR 3 ¶3 The State’s case was based primarily on Berrisford’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Allan N.
the petition and his TPR case was tried before a jury. On October 29, 1996, the jury, with one member
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12254 - 2017-09-21
the petition and his TPR case was tried before a jury. On October 29, 1996, the jury, with one member
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clyde W. Harger v. Caterpillar, Inc.
2000 WI App 241 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2314 - 2017-09-19
2000 WI App 241 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2314 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
case or in his postconviction motions, Crouthers explained that he did not see a “need to bring that up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07
case or in his postconviction motions, Crouthers explained that he did not see a “need to bring that up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, and he contends that his continued confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
, and he contends that his continued confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Golden
. In that case, the trial court had explained to the defendant the repeater nature of the charge without having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12905 - 2017-09-21
. In that case, the trial court had explained to the defendant the repeater nature of the charge without having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12905 - 2017-09-21