Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83384 for case search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83384 for case search.
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ronnie C. Barnes
in the instant case, Barnes’s probation in the prior case was revoked. Barnes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
in the instant case, Barnes’s probation in the prior case was revoked. Barnes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 317 Wis. 2d 161, 765 N.W.2d 794. During the plea colloquy in this case, the court did not mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123008 - 2014-10-08
, 317 Wis. 2d 161, 765 N.W.2d 794. During the plea colloquy in this case, the court did not mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123008 - 2014-10-08
2007 WI 10
2007 WI 10 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP278-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27896 - 2007-01-22
2007 WI 10 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP278-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27896 - 2007-01-22
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11565 - 2005-03-31
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. (citation and brackets omitted). The ‘“sentence imposed in each case should call for the minimum amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37529 - 2014-09-15
. (citation and brackets omitted). The ‘“sentence imposed in each case should call for the minimum amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37529 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31