Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83433 for simple case search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83433 for simple case search.
State v. Daniel Anderson
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-0087-CR, 96-0088-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17082 - 2012-05-09
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-0087-CR, 96-0088-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17082 - 2012-05-09
State v. Daniel Anderson
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-0087-CR, 96-0088-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17083 - 2012-05-09
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-0087-CR, 96-0088-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17083 - 2012-05-09
Trisha A. Taylor v. Greatway Insurance Company
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1329
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15545 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1329
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7705 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076929 - 2026-02-18
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076929 - 2026-02-18
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy W. Senn
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Schultz brought a shotgun in a hard black case to the robbery. On cross-examination, he said Schultz had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
Schultz brought a shotgun in a hard black case to the robbery. On cross-examination, he said Schultz had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the proceedings, at which the DMCPS initial assessment senior specialist, the ongoing case manager, and Joan all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026618 - 2025-10-21
of the proceedings, at which the DMCPS initial assessment senior specialist, the ongoing case manager, and Joan all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026618 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29