Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 39351 - 39360 of 83431 for simple case search.
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy W. Senn
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Schultz brought a shotgun in a hard black case to the robbery. On cross-examination, he said Schultz had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
Schultz brought a shotgun in a hard black case to the robbery. On cross-examination, he said Schultz had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the proceedings, at which the DMCPS initial assessment senior specialist, the ongoing case manager, and Joan all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026618 - 2025-10-21
of the proceedings, at which the DMCPS initial assessment senior specialist, the ongoing case manager, and Joan all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026618 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
State v. Saul R. Lopez
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8091 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8091 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry A. Phillips
convictions. This court concludes No. 98-1056-CR 2 that under the circumstances in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15
convictions. This court concludes No. 98-1056-CR 2 that under the circumstances in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
case. See Transportation Ins. Co., Inc. v. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 291-92, 507 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
case. See Transportation Ins. Co., Inc. v. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 291-92, 507 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
cooperation. ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
cooperation. ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case concerns a one-acre parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case concerns a one-acre parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26