Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39371 - 39380 of 68874 for he.
Search results 39371 - 39380 of 68874 for he.
State v. Eugene G.
, and then extended the newly‑revised order for a year.[2] He contends that this procedure, requested by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
, and then extended the newly‑revised order for a year.[2] He contends that this procedure, requested by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a new trial. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the State’s use
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246666 - 2019-09-11
a new trial. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the State’s use
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246666 - 2019-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was based on information provided by a citizen informant who called to report an incident he had, while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108969 - 2017-09-21
was based on information provided by a citizen informant who called to report an incident he had, while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108969 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
hearing because no evidence of the crime was found on his person, he was not identified or arrested
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22
hearing because no evidence of the crime was found on his person, he was not identified or arrested
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22
State v. Gary Mahlum
from one residence. Mahlum appeals on the grounds that he should have been convicted of only one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14403 - 2005-03-31
from one residence. Mahlum appeals on the grounds that he should have been convicted of only one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
at sentencing because he did not provide her with a No. 2009AP914-CR 2 copy of the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51363 - 2014-09-15
at sentencing because he did not provide her with a No. 2009AP914-CR 2 copy of the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51363 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
acknowledged to the court that he did not contest the State’s ability to prove the facts necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531996 - 2022-06-14
acknowledged to the court that he did not contest the State’s ability to prove the facts necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531996 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Arthur Foster
pretrial motion to suppress his inculpatory statements to Meloney Raebel. He alleges that because Raebel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10019 - 2017-09-19
pretrial motion to suppress his inculpatory statements to Meloney Raebel. He alleges that because Raebel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10019 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ronald J. Rucks v. George Burnett
the prescriptive easement granted to Rucks. Burnett also disputes the trial court’s additional finding that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
the prescriptive easement granted to Rucks. Burnett also disputes the trial court’s additional finding that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by a statement that he made at the sentencing hearing, where he referred to the crime as a “strict liability type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
by a statement that he made at the sentencing hearing, where he referred to the crime as a “strict liability type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18