Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39371 - 39380 of 63519 for records/1000.
Search results 39371 - 39380 of 63519 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
and voluntarily entering a plea. Although “not intended to eliminate the need for the court to make a record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
and voluntarily entering a plea. Although “not intended to eliminate the need for the court to make a record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed the record and reject both of these arguments. ¶6 The trial court based its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
reviewed the record and reject both of these arguments. ¶6 The trial court based its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
State v. Dale W. Repinski
, the record at the sentencing hearing reflects that Repinski reviewed the materials of the addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
, the record at the sentencing hearing reflects that Repinski reviewed the materials of the addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale W. Repinski
, the record at the sentencing hearing reflects that Repinski reviewed the materials of the addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10180 - 2005-03-31
, the record at the sentencing hearing reflects that Repinski reviewed the materials of the addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10180 - 2005-03-31
Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
. Specifically, a variance should be denied when the record before the zoning board of appeals “demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
. Specifically, a variance should be denied when the record before the zoning board of appeals “demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and No. 2022AP1628-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28
of the briefs and No. 2022AP1628-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to circuit court without a new trial. The circuit court judge will review a transcript of the tape recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
to circuit court without a new trial. The circuit court judge will review a transcript of the tape recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Nos. 2013AP2225-CRNM 2013AP2226-CRNM 2 reviewing the Records and the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109481 - 2017-09-21
Nos. 2013AP2225-CRNM 2013AP2226-CRNM 2 reviewing the Records and the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109481 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that [Jimeca H.’s lawyer] testified that she keeps no written records of her consultation in regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32404 - 2014-09-15
that [Jimeca H.’s lawyer] testified that she keeps no written records of her consultation in regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
her motion for a mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673207 - 2023-06-27
her motion for a mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673207 - 2023-06-27