Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39371 - 39380 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 39371 - 39380 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Scott Mullen v. Gerald VandeVoort
the project when the Mullens did not pay. The Mullens then filed a small claims action, Case No. 02-SC-443
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5589 - 2017-09-19
the project when the Mullens did not pay. The Mullens then filed a small claims action, Case No. 02-SC-443
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5589 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert J. Stynes
to his arraignment, Stynes requested a substitution of judge and the case was assigned to Judge Robert J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
to his arraignment, Stynes requested a substitution of judge and the case was assigned to Judge Robert J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
their involvement in the case and then being here for sentencing where I think almost all of them chose to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35639 - 2009-02-23
their involvement in the case and then being here for sentencing where I think almost all of them chose to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35639 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Debbie A. Ramos
was not discovered until the third day of the State’s case-in-chief. See id., slip op. at 3. The State crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11448 - 2017-09-19
was not discovered until the third day of the State’s case-in-chief. See id., slip op. at 3. The State crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11448 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel Anderson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rudy A. Wendt
and affirm the judgment. The State’s case against Wendt was based on allegations that, while subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13020 - 2017-09-21
and affirm the judgment. The State’s case against Wendt was based on allegations that, while subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
a confession to ‘sew up’ the case against him.” For the reasons stated below, we reject Addison’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54140 - 2011-02-14
a confession to ‘sew up’ the case against him.” For the reasons stated below, we reject Addison’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54140 - 2011-02-14
[PDF]
Melanie A.W. v. Patrick L.W.
in the present case, WIS. STAT. § 48.415(8), provides as grounds for termination of parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3366 - 2017-09-19
in the present case, WIS. STAT. § 48.415(8), provides as grounds for termination of parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3366 - 2017-09-19