Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39381 - 39390 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 39381 - 39390 of 83455 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
Frontsheet
2012 WI 18 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP2326-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78956 - 2012-02-29
2012 WI 18 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP2326-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78956 - 2012-02-29
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case, Glaunert renewed his probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5873 - 2005-03-31
jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case, Glaunert renewed his probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. §§ 939.50(3)(a), 939.63(1)(b). Pursuant to a plea bargain, Dubose resolved the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143202 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. §§ 939.50(3)(a), 939.63(1)(b). Pursuant to a plea bargain, Dubose resolved the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
[PDF]
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2009AP3080-CR 3 ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63727 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP3080-CR 3 ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63727 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 90
2008 WI App 90 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1289-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14
2008 WI App 90 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1289-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30