Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39381 - 39390 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 39381 - 39390 of 83455 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Leroy W. Senn
motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we agree, and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
, we agree, and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Floyd A. Worth
in this case. Maintaining that he did indeed reject probation, Worth points to two remarks he made during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13191 - 2017-09-21
in this case. Maintaining that he did indeed reject probation, Worth points to two remarks he made during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13191 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel Anderson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael W. Farrell
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1179-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1179-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiency. The court reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
deficiency. The court reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14