Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3941 - 3950 of 30021 for de.
Search results 3941 - 3950 of 30021 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court included in the property division a building on Suburban Drive in De Pere that neither Kurt nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70045 - 2011-08-22
, the court included in the property division a building on Suburban Drive in De Pere that neither Kurt nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70045 - 2011-08-22
[PDF]
State v. John H. Jones, Jr.
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12856 - 2017-09-21
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12856 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a de novo review by the circuit court. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). After Cheryl and Dale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215763 - 2018-07-17
requested a de novo review by the circuit court. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). After Cheryl and Dale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215763 - 2018-07-17
[PDF]
Kinko's, Inc. v. Craig Shuler
court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4363 - 2017-09-19
court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4363 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kelvin Griffin
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Curtis W.Ross
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶8 If a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16126 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶8 If a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Boone entered the plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994951 - 2025-08-13
that Boone entered the plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994951 - 2025-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
Development Authority, Domonic R. D'Acquisto, Mark A. Slocomb, David L. De Angelis and John R. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
Development Authority, Domonic R. D'Acquisto, Mark A. Slocomb, David L. De Angelis and John R. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
posed here call for statutory interpretation, which are reviewed de novo. See Rogers v. Rogers, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131221 - 2014-12-03
posed here call for statutory interpretation, which are reviewed de novo. See Rogers v. Rogers, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131221 - 2014-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶10 The postconviction motion must specifically allege within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶10 The postconviction motion must specifically allege within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29