Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3941 - 3950 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for de novo review. Town Bank v. City Real Estate Dev., LLC, 2010 WI 134, ¶32, 330 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184491 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
is a question of law we review de novo. Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 315, 529 N.W.2d 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4671 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. STAT. § 980.08(4) to a particular set of facts. We review questions of statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28698 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 65
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95672 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Michael D. Graveley Electronic Notice Ralph F
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562359 - 2022-09-07

[PDF] Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. v. Pedro L. Cruz
(1979). Our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 316, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9905 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Beverly Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5365 - 2017-09-19

State v. Gregory Johnson
of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13672 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Curtis W.Ross
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶8 If a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16126 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Timothy J. Helm
violates Helm’s constitutional rights is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Klessig
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4361 - 2017-09-19