Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39401 - 39410 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 39401 - 39410 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Bret J. Chapin
test: the first part requires the defendant to show that his or her counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19880 - 2005-10-11
test: the first part requires the defendant to show that his or her counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19880 - 2005-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was drunk. A subsequent blood test yielded a result of 0.17 blood alcohol content. ¶3 Hammersley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
was drunk. A subsequent blood test yielded a result of 0.17 blood alcohol content. ¶3 Hammersley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2016AP251-CR 5 (c) Motions for testing of physical evidence under s. 971.23(5) or for protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173799 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2016AP251-CR 5 (c) Motions for testing of physical evidence under s. 971.23(5) or for protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 4
for his driver’s license and performed poorly on field sobriety tests. The officer believed that Neill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229074 - 2019-02-08
for his driver’s license and performed poorly on field sobriety tests. The officer believed that Neill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229074 - 2019-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
that the other-acts evidence satisfied all three prongs of the Sullivan test. It also gave the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
that the other-acts evidence satisfied all three prongs of the Sullivan test. It also gave the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any event, as we have indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85394 - 2014-09-15
. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any event, as we have indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85394 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William J. Marth v. Robert Jahn
All parties look to the four-part test for a declaratory judgment set out in State ex rel. Lynch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14934 - 2017-09-21
All parties look to the four-part test for a declaratory judgment set out in State ex rel. Lynch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14934 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deferential” test 2 The State did not argue that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245334 - 2019-08-20
deferential” test 2 The State did not argue that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245334 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
the statute of limitations defense. We are not persuaded. The test of whether a party should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10628 - 2017-09-20
the statute of limitations defense. We are not persuaded. The test of whether a party should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10628 - 2017-09-20
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
. To establish prejudice, the test is whether “counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
. To establish prejudice, the test is whether “counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31