Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39401 - 39410 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 39401 - 39410 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” 3 The record reflects that the check to which Bickerstaff-Wieting referred was actually written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213523 - 2018-05-30
.” 3 The record reflects that the check to which Bickerstaff-Wieting referred was actually written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213523 - 2018-05-30
State v. Emanuel G.
on.” The record belies his suggestion that he was given no guidance. In March 2000, the trial court established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18453 - 2005-06-06
on.” The record belies his suggestion that he was given no guidance. In March 2000, the trial court established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18453 - 2005-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
for obstructing an officer, the offense actually charged and litigated in this case was OWI. Although the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28236 - 2007-02-27
for obstructing an officer, the offense actually charged and litigated in this case was OWI. Although the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28236 - 2007-02-27
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
indicated the name of his counsel in that case did “ring a bell.” ¶11 On this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
indicated the name of his counsel in that case did “ring a bell.” ¶11 On this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. And with the understanding that has been already indicated on the record, correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. The Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160744 - 2017-09-21
. And with the understanding that has been already indicated on the record, correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. The Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160744 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). 4 It is not clear from the record whether the circuit court found Johnson’s statement that “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028555 - 2025-10-28
). 4 It is not clear from the record whether the circuit court found Johnson’s statement that “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028555 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Teressa S.
, then they can’t also be the attorneys for the party, or they can be subject to depositions.” (Record reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2501 - 2017-09-19
, then they can’t also be the attorneys for the party, or they can be subject to depositions.” (Record reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2501 - 2017-09-19
2010 WI APP 118
or whether the court refers to a document or portion of the record predating the plea hearing, the operative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51813 - 2010-08-24
or whether the court refers to a document or portion of the record predating the plea hearing, the operative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51813 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to understand even though specific explanation not shown on record). (Record and statutory citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109016 - 2014-03-17
to understand even though specific explanation not shown on record). (Record and statutory citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109016 - 2014-03-17
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
that counsel was ineffective for failing to demand a speedy trial, we conclude that the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15483 - 2005-03-31
that counsel was ineffective for failing to demand a speedy trial, we conclude that the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15483 - 2005-03-31