Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39411 - 39420 of 83180 for case search.
Search results 39411 - 39420 of 83180 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
case or in his postconviction motions, Crouthers explained that he did not see a “need to bring that up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07
case or in his postconviction motions, Crouthers explained that he did not see a “need to bring that up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, and he contends that his continued confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
, and he contends that his continued confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” II. A. Dismissal as a Sanction ¶7 The primary issue in this case is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49875 - 2014-09-15
.” II. A. Dismissal as a Sanction ¶7 The primary issue in this case is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Juan B. Garcia
and remand the case for a new trial. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On December 14, 2002, Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
and remand the case for a new trial. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On December 14, 2002, Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
lot.” This argument has no merit. The Neighbors have cited no Wisconsin cases that state the mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32727 - 2014-09-15
lot.” This argument has no merit. The Neighbors have cited no Wisconsin cases that state the mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32727 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
folks who wanted a speedy trial got their case adjourned so Mr. Simmons can go to trial. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29408 - 2014-09-15
folks who wanted a speedy trial got their case adjourned so Mr. Simmons can go to trial. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
[PDF]
State v. Charles V. Royster
[not] make the amount of money involved in a particular case irrelevant or preclude the court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24971 - 2017-09-21
[not] make the amount of money involved in a particular case irrelevant or preclude the court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shirley Y. Godiwalla, M.D. v. State of WI Medical Examining Bd.
her. 1 The Board, drawing an analogy to probable cause determinations in criminal cases, responds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24985 - 2017-09-21
her. 1 The Board, drawing an analogy to probable cause determinations in criminal cases, responds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24985 - 2017-09-21