Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39411 - 39420 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.

CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91639 - 2013-01-14

Matthew S. Peterson v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
was satisfied under the facts in this case. In support, he cites two decisions of this court, Trampf and Tasker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14278 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eduardo Perez
. This case involves application of the sentence credit statute, § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., which is an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
.” However, in this case we conclude the transcript of the court’s oral decision, which has now been produced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31728 - 2008-02-04

CA Blank Order
revocation in this case was stayed while he sought postconviction relief in Racine County case 2008CM624
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109245 - 2014-03-18

Rules Hearing
of procedures for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting FILED JAN 4, 2008 David
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31397 - 2008-01-03

COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied the motion, reasoning the present case was distinguished from Goodson because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26

State v. Mario F. Blasnig
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10263 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106033 - 2013-12-26

State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31