Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39411 - 39420 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 39411 - 39420 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.
Matthew S. Peterson v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
was satisfied under the facts in this case. In support, he cites two decisions of this court, Trampf and Tasker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14278 - 2005-03-31
was satisfied under the facts in this case. In support, he cites two decisions of this court, Trampf and Tasker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14278 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eduardo Perez
. This case involves application of the sentence credit statute, § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., which is an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
. This case involves application of the sentence credit statute, § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., which is an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
revocation in this case was stayed while he sought postconviction relief in Racine County case 2008CM624
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109245 - 2014-03-18
revocation in this case was stayed while he sought postconviction relief in Racine County case 2008CM624
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109245 - 2014-03-18
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10263 - 2005-03-31
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10263 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106033 - 2013-12-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106033 - 2013-12-26
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10143 - 2005-03-31
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10143 - 2005-03-31
James W. Parlow v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
decline to address it. We affirm. ¶2 The facts and procedural history of this case are lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19702 - 2005-09-21
decline to address it. We affirm. ¶2 The facts and procedural history of this case are lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19702 - 2005-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP1301 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033328 - 2025-11-05
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP1301 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033328 - 2025-11-05
Julie Ann Coyle v. Patrick Joseph Coyle
days of the entry of the December judgment, at the latest. Where, as here, the case is tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13190 - 2005-03-31
days of the entry of the December judgment, at the latest. Where, as here, the case is tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13190 - 2005-03-31