Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39431 - 39440 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39431 - 39440 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Arturo Perez
to §§ 940.05, 939.63(1)(a)2 and 939.62(1)(c), STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8388 - 2017-09-19
to §§ 940.05, 939.63(1)(a)2 and 939.62(1)(c), STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8388 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
: Patricia D. McMahon, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded with directions; motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
: Patricia D. McMahon, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded with directions; motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.2 Sutrick has filed a response to the no-merit report, raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.2 Sutrick has filed a response to the no-merit report, raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is scheduled for April 23, 2012. The circuit court granted the defendant’s motion for in camera inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81333 - 2014-09-15
is scheduled for April 23, 2012. The circuit court granted the defendant’s motion for in camera inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81333 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. and Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court ruled that the Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33537 - 2008-09-29
. and Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court ruled that the Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33537 - 2008-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
Parts & Supply. In response to Honeywell’s motion for summary judgment, Ms. Lemberger identified Andrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104441 - 2013-11-18
Parts & Supply. In response to Honeywell’s motion for summary judgment, Ms. Lemberger identified Andrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104441 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
Joshua Scheideler v. Smith & Associates, Inc.
motion was also set for June 20, 1995. After the Smith Agency filed its motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10331 - 2017-09-20
motion was also set for June 20, 1995. After the Smith Agency filed its motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10331 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), and she challenges the denial of her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
2 with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), and she challenges the denial of her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
State v. Anthony J. Randle
and 940.225(3) (1997-98).[2] He also appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4020 - 2005-03-31
and 940.225(3) (1997-98).[2] He also appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4020 - 2005-03-31
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, first offense. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, first offense. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31