Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39431 - 39440 of 59408 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 39431 - 39440 of 59408 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and intentionally pointing a firearm at a person, both as repeaters. Ward claims the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35789 - 2014-09-15
and intentionally pointing a firearm at a person, both as repeaters. Ward claims the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James L. Koskey v. The Town of Bergen
action 1 against the Town of Bergen. They claim that the Town condemned their land without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15899 - 2017-09-21
action 1 against the Town of Bergen. They claim that the Town condemned their land without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15899 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the proof requirement of § 973.12(1) was not complied with. 4 Prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91221 - 2014-09-15
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the proof requirement of § 973.12(1) was not complied with. 4 Prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91221 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing hearing.” She claims “[t]he law is clear that a circuit court must consider probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
sentencing hearing.” She claims “[t]he law is clear that a circuit court must consider probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
would be wholly frivolous, not whether such a claim is likely to prevail. See McCoy v. Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195933 - 2017-09-21
would be wholly frivolous, not whether such a claim is likely to prevail. See McCoy v. Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the DNA surcharge should not have been imposed as mandatory, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21
to a claim that the DNA surcharge should not have been imposed as mandatory, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the record does not support the claim that the court had any expectation as to sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
, the record does not support the claim that the court had any expectation as to sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Levi Booth
. No. 2003AP2613 2 on the ground that Booth’s claims were barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20701 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2003AP2613 2 on the ground that Booth’s claims were barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20701 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2016AP184-CR 2 (2015-16). 2 Although we reject Holstrom’s claim for entitlement to 258 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183973 - 2017-09-21
2016AP184-CR 2 (2015-16). 2 Although we reject Holstrom’s claim for entitlement to 258 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles A. Poindexter II v. Pamela J. Kagan
(Ct. App. 1992). ¶8 Poindexter’s third argument is his claim that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21
(Ct. App. 1992). ¶8 Poindexter’s third argument is his claim that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21