Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39431 - 39440 of 58492 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
in the loss of their dog. Society did not appear at trial, and the circuit court entered a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24

Lillie M. Jones v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
that the trial court erroneously concluded that Wisconsin’s safe-place statute, Wis. Stat. §101.11, creates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31

Michael J. Kaufman v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation
the trial court erred when it concluded a nonduplication clause in Bituminous’s underinsured motorist (UIM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6883 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing, Osowski filed the postconviction motion that underlies this appeal, contending his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581670 - 2022-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS
or resentencing. Byrnes contends that: (1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83872 - 2012-06-20

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
of the case; the procedural status of the case leading up to the appeal; the disposition in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Theodore A. Quartana
the trial court’s determination that Quartana improperly refused to take the test. Sometime after 2:00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12184 - 2017-09-21

Bobbie Gohde v. MSI Insurance Company
& Goisman, S.C. of Milwaukee, for The Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4268 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Johnny Larry v. David W. Schwarz
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. PER CURIAM. Johnny Larry appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10254 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Additionally, Johnson contends that a defamation trial would violate her First Amendment rights. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028555 - 2025-10-28