Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39441 - 39450 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39441 - 39450 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. George G. Kidd
), 939.63, and 939.05, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9997 - 2005-03-31
), 939.63, and 939.05, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9997 - 2005-03-31
State v. Adam J. Soltis
filed a motion to suppress evidence resulting from the blood test because he argued he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7625 - 2005-03-31
filed a motion to suppress evidence resulting from the blood test because he argued he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Luis A. Martinez
motion to No. 02-1357-CR 2 suppress. 1 The State, in a brief filed by the office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
motion to No. 02-1357-CR 2 suppress. 1 The State, in a brief filed by the office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
State v. Pierre Davis
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The sole issue is whether the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9668 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The sole issue is whether the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion. Kiser argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033539 - 2025-11-06
his postconviction motion. Kiser argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033539 - 2025-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court erred by denying his suppression motions, but we conclude the dispositive issue is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
that the court erred by denying his suppression motions, but we conclude the dispositive issue is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary E. Haun v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
it granted Rankin’s motions in limine, preventing the jury from learning of Rankin’s criminal convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3327 - 2017-09-19
it granted Rankin’s motions in limine, preventing the jury from learning of Rankin’s criminal convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3327 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his motion for a new trial. Kelly argues that he received ineffective assistance because his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28
denying his motion for a new trial. Kelly argues that he received ineffective assistance because his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
State v. Jerry Lee Cox
motion. 1 Cox’s appellate counsel filed a no merit report pursuant to RULE 809.32, STATS., and Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13799 - 2014-09-15
motion. 1 Cox’s appellate counsel filed a no merit report pursuant to RULE 809.32, STATS., and Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the charge of misdemeanor theft was dismissed on the State’s motion. After the State rested its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257702 - 2020-04-14
, the charge of misdemeanor theft was dismissed on the State’s motion. After the State rested its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257702 - 2020-04-14