Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39441 - 39450 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 39441 - 39450 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
Mark Cimbalnik v. Patricia Guy
fee. Before adjourning the case, however, the trial court heard the respective positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7379 - 2017-09-20
fee. Before adjourning the case, however, the trial court heard the respective positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7379 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181108 - 2017-09-21
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
because it made a note of the terms of the plea bargain in the case file and specifically recalled reading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2009-01-27
because it made a note of the terms of the plea bargain in the case file and specifically recalled reading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facie case for summary judgment and, therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181984 - 2017-09-21
facie case for summary judgment and, therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Glenn v. George Huxhold
their complaint. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Because we decide this case principally on procedural grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10650 - 2017-09-20
their complaint. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Because we decide this case principally on procedural grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10650 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Janice D.
cases on the motion of Janice D.’s attorney. Nos. 03-2207 03-2208 3 outside the homes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6780 - 2017-09-20
cases on the motion of Janice D.’s attorney. Nos. 03-2207 03-2208 3 outside the homes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6780 - 2017-09-20
09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
a motion.” Woodford’s counsel made one last comment, “Your Honor, but the Court—the case law suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
a motion.” Woodford’s counsel made one last comment, “Your Honor, but the Court—the case law suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
their case adjourned so Mr. Simmons can go to trial. The case then proceeded to trial, and Simmons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
their case adjourned so Mr. Simmons can go to trial. The case then proceeded to trial, and Simmons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
took off in the middle of last night to avoid being here for this case. The State argued that Simpson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112225 - 2014-05-12
took off in the middle of last night to avoid being here for this case. The State argued that Simpson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112225 - 2014-05-12